Sir, Tim Oates’ timely reminder (Herald, October 30) that the Sustrans 5 cycle path is in a bad shape should be a trigger to review the cycling routes in and around Abingdon.

A journey along the bone-shaking Sustrans 5 via Barton Fields can be shattering. Abingdon is blessed with many potentially good and mainly off-road cycle routes, but so few people use them.

An example is that from Northcourt via the River Stert, right into the centre of town. Is this signposted? No. Can it be followed continuously on anything other than a mountain bike? No.

Signposting is the key. Without it, one gets lost on all but the most familiar routes.

If councillors would do what they are best able — organise a working group — a set of routes could be identified and signs erected. Route numbers would appear on maps. Users would soon identify where improvement is needed, so even if funds are not immediately available, the knowledge would be there. Road traffic and pressure on car parks would decrease. Pollution and health would improve. CO2 production and fuel prices would decrease. Abingdon could boast of a great achievement, even if years behind Oxford.

A leading councillor and a council officer rebuffed me, saying cyclists should pay “road tax”. Well, I pay £360 a year for two ‘vehicle licences’, but when I go into town I prefer to leave them at home. If I use my bus pass, the cost is born by the council. Cycling facilities are worthy of investment and give a good return.

Peter Harbour, South Avenue, Abingdon